| commit | c9d4f6638bbc7ba84534c2460037f19915114a95 | |
| author | Karl Hammar <karl@aspodata.se> | |
| Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:08:01 +0000 (26 16:08 +0200) | ||
| committer | Peter TB Brett <peter@peter-b.co.uk> | |
| Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:05:50 +0000 (27 09:05 +0100) | ||
| tree | 1a85f7386f7b7823a7128e5439954f3dda690bfb | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 08f64a801c3af30ef54861f3549f3de6ea02b1b2 | commitdiff |
Correct SCM_ASSERT() usage with incorrect SCM_ARGx.
From guile documentation:
-- Macro: void SCM_ASSERT (int TEST, SCM OBJ, unsigned int POSITION,
const char *SUBR)
...
-- Macro: int SCM_ARG1
...
-- Macro: int SCM_ARG7
One of the above values can be used for POSITION to indicate the
number of the argument of SUBR which is being checked.
...
Some SCM_ASSERT() calls have the wrong SCM_ARGx for its TEST and OBJ.
Reviewed-by: Peter TB Brett <peter@peter-b.co.uk>
From guile documentation:
-- Macro: void SCM_ASSERT (int TEST, SCM OBJ, unsigned int POSITION,
const char *SUBR)
...
-- Macro: int SCM_ARG1
...
-- Macro: int SCM_ARG7
One of the above values can be used for POSITION to indicate the
number of the argument of SUBR which is being checked.
...
Some SCM_ASSERT() calls have the wrong SCM_ARGx for its TEST and OBJ.
Reviewed-by: Peter TB Brett <peter@peter-b.co.uk>